• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Galen Institute

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Mission and History
    • Grace-Marie Turner bio
    • Who was Galen?
  • Activities
    • Core Activities
    • Commentary and Oped Tutorial
    • Our Book
    • Galen Guides
  • Contact Us
  • Major Papers
  • Broadcast Interviews
  • Health Policy Consensus Group

Destructive New Subsidies

POSTED BY Doug Badger on May 26, 2021.

Obamacare Subsidies: Six Reasons Congress Should Not Make Temporary Increases Permanent

By Doug Badger
The Heritage Foundation, May 26, 2021

The recently enacted American Rescue Plan Act spent an estimated $90 billion on free health insurance for the unemployed and on temporarily increasing Obamacare premium subsidies.  That temporary expansion made some of the nation’s highest-paid workers eligible for government premium assistance, giving those who already had private insurance incentives to shift to government-subsidized coverage.

In his new paper for Heritage, Senior Fellow Doug Badger explains the damage this temporary Obamacare premium expansion already is doing and the even greater damage it would cause if it were to be made permanent. 

Congress should not have enacted these temporary expansions. It would be worse to make them permanent, Badger explains.  

President Biden has proposed enlarging the premium assistance program in the Affordable Care Act to make bigger payments to insurance companies on behalf of those who already have subsidized coverage. He has also proposed a permanent entitlement to government assistance for everyone, including those in the top two income quintiles.

A permanent Obamacare subsidy expansion would benefit primarily the rich, those who already have private coverage, and insurance companies.  It may also induce employers to drop employees’ existing coverage, forcing workers into a government program with high cost-sharing and narrow physician networks.

Badger writes that the decision to temporarily increase federal premium subsidies was ill-considered:

  • It was based on the false premise that millions of workers and their dependents had lost coverage due to government lockdowns. 
  • It poured almost all the new spending into subsidizing the premiums of people who already had insurance, and it made the nation’s highest earners eligible for government premium assistance.
  • It enlarged federal payments to insurance companies in one of their most profitable lines of business and created perverse incentives to inflate premiums.  

Making these subsidies permanent not only would double down on these bad policies but could also result in millions of Americans losing their employer-sponsored coverage.

Congress erred in enlarging premium subsidies in March. It should not compound that error by making the expanded subsidy structure permanent.


Read the Full Paper

Filed Under: Doug Badger, Published, The Heritage Foundation

Primary Sidebar

Our Annual Report

Health Care Choices 20/20:

A Vision for the Future

SEARCH

Categories

  • Brian Blase
  • Consumer-Directed Care
  • Doug Badger
  • Grace-Marie Turner
  • Health Insurance
  • Health Policy Consensus Group
  • Health Savings Accounts
  • Innovation
  • Medicaid
  • Medicare
  • Newsletter
  • ObamaCare
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Published
    • Forbes
    • Fox Business
    • Health Affairs
    • LA Times
    • National Review
    • New York Post
    • RealClearHealth
    • Sun Sentinel
    • The Daily Signal
    • The Heritage Foundation
    • The Hill
    • The New York Times
    • The Wall Street Journal
    • The Washington Times
  • Reform Initiatives
  • State Issues
  • Uncategorized

LATEST NEWSLETTER ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

Social Media

Like Us On Facebook

Twitter: @galeninstitute

 

Copyright Galen Institute at Donors. © 2023; · Log in