The Canadian System Failed Natasha Richardson

Questions are rightly being raised about whether actress Natasha Richardson could have been saved if her skiing accident had occurred in the U.S. rather than in Canada. No one will ever know if the tragedy could have been averted, but it is worth looking at the timing and medical resources available to her.


Click here for The Globe and Mail's article on "The five-hour scramble to save Natasha Richardson."


Ms. Richardson did not wear a helmet during her beginner’s skiing lesson, and she sent medics away just after she fell. But once they were called back, it was four precious hours before she began to get the care that could have saved her life.

Medical reports indicate she had an intracranial bleed, and every pump of her heart put more pressure on her brain. The lack of a medevac helicopter meant she had to be driven in an ambulance from the Mont Tremblant ski resort to the Centre Hospitalier Laurentien in Ste. Agathe, 40-minutes away.

She was there for two hours, but the hospital had no scanning equipment and no neurosurgeon available to do the emergency surgery she needed to relieve the pressure. She then had to be driven another hour to Sacré-Coeur Hospital in Montreal to get trauma care.

The delay between the 911 call from the resort and reaching the specialized trauma center in Montreal could have been shortened considerably had helicopter transport been available or if the hospital near the resort had more sophisticated diagnostic equipment and surgical capabilities.

Canada's top head trauma doctor told the Associated Press that that "Our system isn't set up for traumas and doesn't match what's available in other Canadian cities, let alone in the States."

Government officials decided against paying for a medevac helicopter in the province of Quebec, despite a population of 7.5 million, half of whom live in Montreal. They have repeatedly rebuffed a private air transport company that wanted to offer its services. Instead, government officials opted to buy two airplanes which need much longer landing strips and weren't an option for Ms. Richardson.

The questions are relevant to the U.S. About 800 medical helicopters in the U.S. fly 400,000 missions each year, plus about 100,000 fixed wing medical flights. Major ski resorts tout their medical capabilities.

Canada spends less on health care than the U.S. does, but the scarcity of diagnostic equipment and the lack of any medical helicopters in Quebec comes with a different price. Even smaller, neighboring Nova Scotia has medical helicopters.

It is a tragedy indeed. We don't think about helicopters as being medical equipment, but when a centrally-planned health care system is making decisions about what the government will pay for, the big ticket items are often the first to go.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

About the author

Questions are rightly being raised about whether actress Natasha Richardson could have been saved if her skiing accident had occurred in the U.S. rather than in Canada. No one will ever know if the tragedy could have been averted, but it is worth looking at the timing and medical resources available to her.


Click here for The Globe and Mail's article on "The five-hour scramble to save Natasha Richardson."


Ms. Richardson did not wear a helmet during her beginner’s skiing lesson, and she sent medics away just after she fell. But once they were called back, it was four precious hours before she began to get the care that could have saved her life.

Medical reports indicate she had an intracranial bleed, and every pump of her heart put more pressure on her brain. The lack of a medevac helicopter meant she had to be driven in an ambulance from the Mont Tremblant ski resort to the Centre Hospitalier Laurentien in Ste. Agathe, 40-minutes away.

She was there for two hours, but the hospital had no scanning equipment and no neurosurgeon available to do the emergency surgery she needed to relieve the pressure. She then had to be driven another hour to Sacré-Coeur Hospital in Montreal to get trauma care.

The delay between the 911 call from the resort and reaching the specialized trauma center in Montreal could have been shortened considerably had helicopter transport been available or if the hospital near the resort had more sophisticated diagnostic equipment and surgical capabilities.

Canada's top head trauma doctor told the Associated Press that that "Our system isn't set up for traumas and doesn't match what's available in other Canadian cities, let alone in the States."

Government officials decided against paying for a medevac helicopter in the province of Quebec, despite a population of 7.5 million, half of whom live in Montreal. They have repeatedly rebuffed a private air transport company that wanted to offer its services. Instead, government officials opted to buy two airplanes which need much longer landing strips and weren't an option for Ms. Richardson.

The questions are relevant to the U.S. About 800 medical helicopters in the U.S. fly 400,000 missions each year, plus about 100,000 fixed wing medical flights. Major ski resorts tout their medical capabilities.

Canada spends less on health care than the U.S. does, but the scarcity of diagnostic equipment and the lack of any medical helicopters in Quebec comes with a different price. Even smaller, neighboring Nova Scotia has medical helicopters.

It is a tragedy indeed. We don't think about helicopters as being medical equipment, but when a centrally-planned health care system is making decisions about what the government will pay for, the big ticket items are often the first to go.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

About the author