• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Galen Institute

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Mission and History
    • Grace-Marie Turner bio
    • Who was Galen?
  • Activities
    • Core Activities
    • Commentary and Oped Tutorial
    • Our Book
    • Galen Guides
  • Contact Us
  • Major Papers
  • Broadcast Interviews
  • Health Policy Consensus Group

Cutting the Red Tape: Saving Jobs from PPACA’s Harmful Regulations

POSTED BY Galen Institute on September 15, 2011.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

•    While most companies initially hoped they would be able to preserve much of their existing group health plans under the new grandfather provisions, a survey by Aon Hewitt Consulting found almost all will not. The administration’s own estimates indicate most employers will not be able to maintain grandfathered status.

•    The grandfathering rules box employers into a corner. They cannot make changes, other than minor modifications, to their health plans to keep costs down without being forced to comply with expensive PPACA regulations that increase their health costs.

•    Health costs are directly related to creation of new jobs. Higher health costs put additional pressures on the employer’s bottom line and increase the cost of hiring new workers, in turn discouraging job creation. This is not good news for the economy or for unemployed workers.

•    Many people argue that the ACA’s restrictions are necessary to keep employers from cutting benefits or imposing higher health costs onto their employees. But employees actually pay the price for higher health costs since health coverage is part of employee compensation.

•    A recent RAND study found that most of the pay increases that employees have received over the last ten years have been consumed by health costs. The study found that the typical family had just $95 a month more to devote to non-health spending in 2009 than they had a decade earlier. By contrast, the authors say that if the rate of health care cost growth had not exceeded general inflation, the family would have had $545 more per month in spendable income instead of $95 — a difference of $5,400 per year.

•    It is in the interest of both employers and employees to keep health costs down, and the grandfathering regulations issued by HHS restrict their ability to do that.

•    Health costs are a jobs issue. The administration recognizes that companies need relief from burdensome and expensive regulations that impact their competitiveness and their ability to generate the revenues they need to hire more workers. Withdrawing the grandfathering regulation would be a good place to start to give them that relief.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FULL TESTIMONY >>

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

Our Annual Report

Health Care Choices 20/20:

A Vision for the Future

SEARCH

Categories

  • Brian Blase
  • Consumer-Directed Care
  • Doug Badger
  • Grace-Marie Turner
  • Health Insurance
  • Health Policy Consensus Group
  • Health Savings Accounts
  • Innovation
  • Medicaid
  • Medicare
  • Newsletter
  • ObamaCare
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Published
    • Forbes
    • Fox Business
    • Health Affairs
    • LA Times
    • National Review
    • New York Post
    • RealClearHealth
    • Sun Sentinel
    • The Daily Signal
    • The Heritage Foundation
    • The Hill
    • The New York Times
    • The Wall Street Journal
    • The Washington Times
  • Reform Initiatives
  • State Issues
  • Uncategorized

LATEST NEWSLETTER ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

Social Media

Like Us On Facebook

Twitter: @galeninstitute

 

Copyright Galen Institute at Donors. © 2023; · Log in