IN THIS ISSUE:
? Nothing But HSAs
The new Health Savings Accounts (HSA) provision included in the Medicare bill just passed the Senate 54-44 and soon will be signed by the President. The new law will go into effect January 1, 2004. All 250 million non-elderly Americans will now have access to a Medical Savings Account, and one that is far more attractive than the Archer MSAs that were enacted in 1996.
Account holders must have a qualified insurance plan, but the insurance requirements have been opened up considerably. Allowable deductibles have been lowered to $1,000 for an individual and $2,000 for a family. The maximum deductible requirement has been replaced by maximum out-of-pocket limits of $5,000 for individuals and $10,000 for families. These limits include deductibles and coinsurance for “in-network” providers. These amounts will be adjusted annually for cost of living increases. There is no restriction on the stop-loss limits for out-of-network services.
Preventive care services may be covered on a first-dollar basis. That is, deductibles will not have to apply to services as defined by section 1871 of the Social Security Act.
Annual contributions to the HSA are limited to 100% of the deductible up to a maximum of $2,250 for an individual or $4,500 for a family. Account holders aged 55 and up may make additional contributions of $500 in 2004, increasing by $100 each year until it reaches $1,000 in 2009.
Such contributions may be made by any combination of employer and individual. Employer contributions are excludable from income and individual contributions are deductible “above the line.” That is, a taxpayer does not have to itemize deductions in order to take the contribution as a deduction. Employers may offer HSAs as part of a section 125(d) cafeteria plan.
Funds in an HSA may be invested as the account holder sees fit (CDs, money market funds, mutual funds, etc.) except they may not be invested in life insurance contracts. Earnings on the accounts build-up free of taxes. The funds will be held in a trust administered by a bank, insurance company, or other approved administrator.
Funds may be withdrawn tax-free to pay for qualified medical expenses, which include all section 213(d) expenses, except health insurance premium payments. HSA funds may be used to pay premiums only for long-term care insurance, COBRA continuation premiums, or other health insurance premiums for people receiving unemployment benefits.
Funds withdrawn for non-medical purposes will be included in the account holder’s gross income and taxed accordingly. A penalty of 10% will also be applied except in cases of death, disability, or Medicare eligibility. In the case of death or divorce, the account may be transferred to a spouse without incurring taxes. If someone other than a spouse is the beneficiary, the funds will be treated as taxable income.
While it is always hard to predict how markets will react to any change in conditions, we can reasonably expect the following developments:
? There will be a rush of banks, insurance companies and third-party administrators (TPAs) to develop products. The previous restrictions on Archer MSAs have been removed. There is no longer a sunset provision, there is no limit on employer size or total enrollment. Companies were reluctant to invest much development effort in a product that was so tentative. But now there is a far greater assurance that such efforts have a chance to succeed.
? All these development efforts will lead to far greater public awareness of the product. In the past, there were so few vendors that MSAs remained almost a secret, of no consequence at all to anyone who wasn’t self-employed or the owner of a small business. Now there will be a critical mass of publicity and promotion that will break through the fog.
? The individual market will convert to HSAs in droves. It is hard to imagine very many individual purchasers who would not prefer an HSA over anything else on the market. Individual buyers still will not get a tax break on their premium payments, but their HSA contributions will be 100% deductible. They will have a strong incentive to minimize their premium payment and maximize their HSA contribution. Plus, the lower allowable deductible removes a major hurdle. A large number of individual policies already have deductibles of $1,000.
? The small group market will be slower. Small employers are not benefits innovators. They don’t have the time to think much about benefit options. They have had the MSA option available for several years and haven’t paid much attention to it. Small employers were very slow to move to managed care, and they are well behind the rest of the market today in increasing employee cost-sharing. They have been more likely to simply not cover dependents at all, and HSAs don’t offer much help in that area.
? The fully-insured mid-market is a different story. Companies with 100 to 1,000 employees are more likely to have staff that concentrates on benefits options and has the time to investigate new products. They are also able to keep the conversion cost-neutral – raising deductibles means lowering premiums. The premium savings can be contributed to the HSA, to be supplemented with a worker’s own tax-deductible contribution. These companies have been raising cost-sharing requirements anyway, so the prospect of employee responsibility for funding part of the HSA is less of a stretch in this segment.
? Self-insured large companies will likely stay with Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). Companies that pay directly for the services consumed are unlikely to be attracted to HSAs, which expect an up-front contribution of money for all employees whether they are using services or not. HRAs have the considerable advantage of not requiring pre-funding. Money is paid out only when a service is incurred, exactly as if the worker were covered by the health plan. On the other hand, the presence of HSAs in the market will put some pressure on HRA employers to allow greater portability of HRA funds. It will be harder to deny employees access to that money when other companies are offering full ownership of an HSA account.
? The uninsured should find it easier to gain coverage. Medical Savings Accounts have already proven their popularity with the uninsured. The IRS reports that 73% of new MSA accounts are set up by people who had been uninsured for six months or more. But MSAs are available only to the self-employed or employees whose employers set up the program. HSAs will be available to everybody – especially those workers whose employers provide no coverage at all, and who make up the vast majority of the uninsured. Plus, as HSAs gain market share, more and more workers will have a source of funds to pay for coverage when they are laid-off or otherwise lose their jobs. HSAs should have a profound effect on the short-term uninsured.
The market is ready for this. All of the discussion about consumer directed health care in the last few years has sensitized corporate decision makers to the advantage of putting more control in the hands of employees. HSAs provide them with the perfect opportunity to do exactly that. The year 2004 will probably not see massive enrollment because vendors will need to work on developing new products and marketing strategies. But by mid-year there will be an enormous push to gain an early position in this new market and become the recognized “industry leader.”
The timing couldn’t be better, with an improving economy and widespread gains in the equities markets. Venture capital will be in great demand to get the new products off the ground. Get ready for a twelve month race to the finish line of 12/31/04 and the first-year enrollment numbers.
Please send all comments/questions directly to me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
“Consumer Choice Matters” is a free weekly newsletter published by the Galen Institute, a not-for-profit public policy organization specializing in research and education on health policy. Visit our website at http://www.galen.org for more information.
If you wish to subscribe/unsubscribe or update your address, please send an e-mail to email@example.com.
The views expressed in this newsletter are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Galen Institute or its directors.