• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Galen Institute

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Mission and History
    • Grace-Marie Turner bio
    • Who was Galen?
  • Activities
    • Core Activities
    • Commentary and Oped Tutorial
    • Our Book
    • Galen Guides
  • Contact Us
  • Major Papers
  • Broadcast Interviews
  • Health Policy Consensus Group

Subsidizing COBRA Is Bad Policy, Three Former White House Economists Say

POSTED BY Galen Institute on April 30, 2020.

pixelrobot – stock.adobe.com

Big businesses, insurance companies, hospitals, unions, and liberal policy groups are calling on Congress to subsidize COBRA policies to ensure that the recently unemployed can maintain their employer-based health insurance coverage. While the goal is understandable, the policy is misguided and would create a series of problems.

As such, Congress should avoid taking this action. First, subsidizing COBRA policies would further weaken the economic recovery. Congress already has made it more attractive for tens of millions of people to be unemployed than to work, with its massive unemployment benefit increase that lasts until August. Many businesses have reported this is making it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for them to re-open. Providing a COBRA subsidy would further weaken workers’ incentive to return to work and would likely spur a new round of layoffs as employers could lay off workers without worrying they would lose their health insurance coverage.

Second, a COBRA subsidy represents corporate welfare since the premium payments would go directly to health insurance companies. This seems particularly ill-timed since insurance companies already are benefitting financially from the mass cancellation of elective health procedures. Moreover, Congress has provided a $175 billion bailout fund for hospitals, partly to care for COVID-19 patients.

If Congress wants to provide assistance for Americans to better afford health care, the help should go directly to the consumers who need it and let them decide the types of coverage that are best for them. Senator Ted Cruz has a pandemic health savings account bill that represents a building block for a far better alternative to a COBRA subsidy. And fortunately, the Trump Administration expanded short-term health plans, which are particularly well suited to provide affordable coverage for those dislocated by the economic shock of the pandemic. Short-term plans are available in many states for as little as three percent of the expanded unemployment benefit and are an important option for many people who have a temporary need for health insurance.

Casey Mulligan
Chief Economist, White House Council of Economic Advisers  2018-2019 
Economics Professor, University of Chicago

Brian Blase
Special Assistant to the President 2017-2019, White House National Economic Council
Senior Research Fellow, Galen Institute

Doug Badger
Special Assistant to the President 2003-2004, White House National Economic Council
Senior Research Fellow, Galen Institute

Filed Under: Brian Blase, Doug Badger

Primary Sidebar

Our Annual Report

Health Care Choices 20/20:

A Vision for the Future

SEARCH

Categories

  • Brian Blase
  • Consumer-Directed Care
  • Doug Badger
  • Grace-Marie Turner
  • Health Insurance
  • Health Policy Consensus Group
  • Health Savings Accounts
  • Innovation
  • Medicaid
  • Medicare
  • Newsletter
  • ObamaCare
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Published
    • Forbes
    • Fox Business
    • Health Affairs
    • LA Times
    • National Review
    • New York Post
    • RealClearHealth
    • Sun Sentinel
    • The Daily Signal
    • The Heritage Foundation
    • The Hill
    • The New York Times
    • The Wall Street Journal
    • The Washington Times
  • Reform Initiatives
  • State Issues
  • Uncategorized

LATEST NEWSLETTER ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

Social Media

Like Us On Facebook

Twitter: @galeninstitute

 

Copyright Galen Institute at Donors. © 2023; · Log in